In supply chain, disruption is the new normal. To meet customer expectations, organizations must build operations with the right balance of resilience and efficiency. As the geopolitical landscape lurches from crisis to crisis, keeping the focus on the right topics can be a challenge.
At Efficio, we have identified six major trends and challenges shaping supply chains in the next 18 to 24 months:
- Geopolitical tensions in the Red Sea region
- Pressures on transport
- Shifting attitudes towards reshoring and nearshoring
- A dilemma around inventory management
- Labor and material shortages
- ESG challenges
In this viewpoint, we examine each of these supply chain pressures, offering strategies to help businesses adapt and thrive in a rapidly changing environment.
Words by Niccolo Malasoma, Nikhil Vijayan, and the Efficio Supply Chain team
1. Geopolitical tension within the Red Sea region
The Houthi militant group's armed actions over recent months have put a halt to transits by major container shipping companies through critical waterways such as the Strait of Bab al-Mandab, the Suez Canal, and the Red Sea. An S&P Global Market Intelligence analysis indicates that these attacks are unlikely to abate, with vessels required to acquire permits from the Houthi-controlled Maritime Affairs Authority before passing through Yemeni territorial waters.
Significant trade route diversions
In response, major container shipping lines have diverted vessels from the traditional Suez Canal route to the longer Cape of Good Hope route, adding approximately 9,000 nautical miles, or 80%, to the distance sailed. Ocean Network Express Holdings Ltd. emphasized the need for additional capacity from the global fleet, potentially an increase of 7.1%, due to the longer voyages.
The first two months of 2024 saw a 50% drop in Suez Canal trade compared to the previous year, according to the IMF. Meanwhile, a severe drought at the Panama Canal has reduced daily ship crossings, with trade through this route decreasing by 32%.
Global trade costs are going up – and staying high
Diverting container vessels away from the Red Sea has pushed up air freight costs as shippers endeavor to keep Asian-produced goods on shelves despite sea traffic delays. Logistics providers reported a 25-30% increase in demand for mixed sea and air transport in January 2024. Consequently, the average cost to fly 1kg of cargo from the Middle East to Europe increased by 35% from December 2023 to January 2024. Economists warn that these disruptions could keep transport costs elevated for several months, potentially adding 0.3 to 0.4 percentage points to the eurozone's headline inflation measure later in the year.
Route diversions in marine shipping have major financial and environmental impacts. A shipper traveling between Asia and northern Europe via the Cape of Good Hope needs 16 ships for a weekly service instead of the usual 12, with ships traveling 10-15% faster to cut delays. Maritime technology firm OceanScore estimates that these diversions and increased speeds are tripling EU Allowances (EUAs) costs from €98,000 to €285,000 per voyage. These ongoing diversions present significant challenges for shipping companies, as they must balance higher emissions costs with crew and vessel safety.
Efficio recommendation
Craft resilient contingency plans, including scenario planning how various upstream and downstream disruptions can impact your supply chains. Mitigations could include multi-sourcing, planning alternative routes and modes of fulfilment, and holding strategic inventory on-shore and near-shore.
2. Mounting pressures on sea freight and truck transport
Beyond the Red Sea region, the broader landscape of global transportation also faces significant challenges.
Red Sea disruptions are spilling over into the Mediterranean
Mediterranean ports across Algeciras, Barcelona, and Tangier-Med, crucial nodes in the global logistics network, are grappling with unprecedented congestion as they experience a surge in traffic diverted from the Suez Canal. Barcelona, for instance, recorded a 17% rise year-on-year in containers handled in February 2024. Overflowing storage yards and vessel berthing delays speak to the capacity constraints plaguing these critical hubs. Despite being better equipped than during the pandemic, carriers face operational challenges around adjusting schedules, adding vessels, and managing potential congestion and shortages to maintain container traffic flow.
A period of challenge and change for road freight
Current challenges around transportation also extend into road freight operations.
The U.S. faces a severe shortage of truck drivers, with the American Trucking Association (ATA) estimating a deficit of more than 60,000 drivers as of 2023. As an aging workforce and high turnover rates further aggravate the situation, there is an urgent need for skilled drivers in the logistics sector. This tightening capacity is expected to drive rates up. Disruptions at the US-Mexico border and in maritime corridors also pose additional challenges.
Another challenge surrounding road freight is tightening regulations requiring the adoption of electric and hydrogen fleets. For delivery companies, this means they will need to revamp their fleets and substitute standard trucks with electric vehicles to stay compliant. Major manufacturers like Daimler, Volvo, PACCAR, and Iveco are investing in electric and hydrogen trucks to meet emissions targets and are expanding battery production. In the U.S., heavy-duty truck sales grew by nearly 6% in 2023 despite supply chain challenges, with record truck sale figures anticipated for this year; much of this demand will need to be directed towards electric and hydrogen vehicles.
In Europe, truck registrations peaked in 2023 due to earlier orders. Although a 15% decline is projected for 2024, sales of electric trucks are rising due to the introduction of subsidies and emission zones, although further infrastructure development is still needed.
For companies that rely on external partners for delivery, this may mean reevaluating current partners if their fleets are not fully compliant with the new carbon emissions regulations. In addition, during the transition to electric and hydrogen vehicles, companies should expect challenges in terms of efficiency and availability, particularly around delivery routes and lead times.
Efficio recommendation
Increase transparency across your end-to-end network by securing reliable and up-to-date data on your transport capacity and routes. Develop strategic relationships with multiple freight forwarders and shippers to secure logistics capacity, considering potential buffers to add flexibility and handle volatility.
3. Shifting risks and opportunities: Offshoring versus reshoring and nearshoring
The 20th century saw a rise in offshoring, with companies capitalizing on lower production costs and expanded market access. However, recent years have seen companies reassessing the risks associated with offshore operations.
Reshoring and nearshoring in Europe and the US
Shifting economic and geopolitical dynamics, such as pandemic-driven disruptions and US-China trade tensions, combined with increasing wages in traditionally low-cost countries, have prompted many firms to reconsider their global footprint.
As a result, reshoring has gained momentum. 2020 and 2021 in particular saw a significant increase in reshoring activities, as companies sought to mitigate risks and bolster domestic manufacturing capacities. Europe saw a 29% increase in industrial space acquisition or leasing in 2023 compared to 2021, indicating an increase in reshoring and nearshoring trends.
Nearshoring has also emerged as a viable strategy, especially in regions like Eastern Europe. Poland, for instance, is experiencing increased investments from the private sector, positioning itself as a logistics gateway.
For the United States, recent trends indicate a decline in U.S. imports from China. Instead, Mexico has become a focal point for nearshoring due to its geographical proximity, its low-cost and skilled workforce, and the benefits of free trade agreements like the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Moreover, China has been increasing direct investment in Mexico since 2016, further boosting the growing appeal of nearshoring for the U.S..
Reshoring and nearshoring offer strong benefits, but they're not without their challenges
The advantages of nearshoring are manifold. In the short term, it reduces transportation costs and enhances supply chain efficiency. Long-term benefits include heightened competitiveness and profitability. Moreover, data indicates potential social and environmental sustainability improvements, with shorter supply chains contributing to a reduced carbon footprint and energy consumption.
However, reshoring and nearshoring present substantial challenges beyond simple relocation. Labor availability is a critical hurdle, particularly in tight labor markets like the United States, where elevated labor costs can significantly impact operational economics. Moreover, moving operations closer necessitates substantial investments in new infrastructure, including factories and warehouses, alongside strategic updates to existing distribution networks. Navigating regulatory compliance emerges as another significant challenge, requiring adjustments to meet local standards and practices which can vary markedly from those in previous locations. Companies must also ensure quality consistency during the transition, which often requires adjustments in production processes and quality control measures. Despite the proximity gained through reshoring or nearshoring, robust contingency plans, including buffers for potential disruptions, are essential for maintaining supply chain resilience, especially when sourcing raw materials from distant regions.
Efficio recommendation
Evaluate your exposure to risk across labor, raw materials, and third-party services within your end-to-end supply chain. It may make sense to nearshore elements for which you have viable local alternatives and can build solid contingencies, like stock buffers. Businesses will need to analytically assess the trade-off between the financial cost advantages of offshoring with the benefits of nearshoring: for example, improved product quality or faster lead times for customers, both of which could drive increased sales.
4. Balancing efficiency with safety in inventory management
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Just-In-Time (JIT) inventory management was seen as a cornerstone of efficient supply chain practices, preferred for its ability to help minimize working capital, enhance flexibility, and optimize cash flow.
Wavering between preparing for disruption and opening up cash flow
The pandemic revealed the vulnerabilities of a JIT approach, with a reliance on minimal buffer stock levels leading to widespread supply chain disruptions. Post-pandemic, inventory management practices shifted, with many enterprises proactively diversifying their supplier bases, bolstering operational flexibility, and fortifying resilience in preparation for future uncertainties.
However, the current convergence of high interest rates and escalating supply risks presents a dilemma for businesses. Even as they grapple with replenishing inventories amid disruptions, the need to open up operating cash flow is drawing them back into a JIT approach.
Nevertheless, supply chain flexibility and resilience remain paramount. The persistence of unidentified risks, spanning geopolitical conflicts, climate change-induced disruptions, and labor shortages, underscores the ongoing imperative for adaptive strategies that foster resilience and safeguard supply chain integrity. The manufacturing industry, for instance, is forging ahead with precautionary inventory accumulation to mitigate risk and sustain operational continuity.
Efficio recommendation
Companies must find the right balance between cash availability and stock buffers by prioritizing strategic inventory levels for the appropriate products in optimal locations. Leveraging dynamic portfolio segmentation and predictive replenishment strategies can help organizations shift from reactive to proactive inventory management approaches to ensure optimal stock levels while minimizing risks and protecting cash.
5. Global shortages across labor, raw materials, and shipping equipment
The combined disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic, political tensions, and extreme weather events have significantly reduced material and labor availability across various industries’ supply chains.
Demographic shifts, including aging populations, and changes in immigration policies and workforce preferences have created labor shortages. By 2050, countries may lose approximately 92 million working-age individuals and gain over 100 million elderly people. In the U.S., labor shortages are expected to hit sectors such as healthcare, construction, and food as early as 2028. In addition, evolving regulatory frameworks, such as the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, will require comprehensive assessments of workers' welfare throughout the value chain, potentially shrinking the supplier pool as entities struggle to meet stricter standards.
Meanwhile, climate change has led to raw material shortages, particularly affecting agriculture due to severe weather conditions like flooding and droughts. The concentration of food production in a few countries has heightened global food supply chain vulnerabilities. El Niño, for instance, is expected to cause warm and dry conditions in California and increased flooding risks in Peru and Bolivia in 2024. A 1°C temperature rise could reduce food production by approximately 7%; this will impact feedstock commodities like corn, where yields are projected to decline by 20-40% between 2045 and 2055, therefore disrupting the meat supply chain. The textile industry also faces challenges with volatility in cotton production, particularly in regions like China and India, due to water shortages and climate change.
Disrupted global trade routes have led to delays and shortages of empty containers. This has exacerbated cargo flow pressures, hitting countries like India particularly hard.
These labor, raw materials, and shipping equipment disruptions are leading to increased costs, extended lead times, and potential declines in product quality. While companies may seek alternative suppliers to mitigate these shortages, this could impact the quality and consistency of the final products.
Efficio recommendation
Prioritize your supply continuity through strategic inventory and planning measures. Conduct comprehensive impact assessments to understand broader risks and dependencies. Explore diversification options like seeking alternative suppliers or evaluating new locations to mitigate exposure to disruptions. Embrace the change as an opportunity to optimize processes, rationalize operations, reduce waste, and foster innovation within your supply chain.
6. ESG: Taking on Scope 3 emissions
As regulatory and consumer pressures around sustainability intensify, indicators such as the Financial Times’ Europe's Climate Leaders 2024 list show progress towards reducing direct emissions (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2). However, a critical area remains that demands attention: Scope 3 emissions.
Scope 3 emissions: An area of significant opportunity, but also of significant challenges
Scope 3 emissions, which encompass emissions from upstream and downstream activities in an organization’s value chain, often make up a substantial portion of a company's total emissions profile; estimations suggest they may account for up to 70% of its overall environmental footprint. Consequently, Scope 3 emissions should be a focal point for emission reduction strategies.
However, organizations face significant challenges when attempting to tackle Scope 3 emissions:
- Supply chain complexity and visibility: The convoluted nature of supply chains, with multiple tiers and outsourced operations, makes tracking and managing emissions difficult. Limited end-to-end visibility hampers efforts to monitor and reduce upstream indirect emissions.
- Data collection and reporting: Obtaining accurate and standardized emissions data from suppliers is challenging. Many companies struggle to collect accurate and standardized data for the three emissions scopes, particularly for Scope 3, making effective reporting and solid baselining difficult.
- Regulatory compliance and standards: Global supply chains operating across multiple borders face various regulatory requirements. For example, the European Parliament’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) put strict environmental and human rights standards in place. Compliance with these regulations can be costly and complex, necessitating thorough due diligence and strong transparency, which can be difficult to achieve.
- Stakeholder engagement: Managing stakeholder interests and priorities is crucial for achieving Scope 3 net-zero targets. Conflicting interests, resistance to change, and the resource-intensive nature of sustainability initiatives can hinder progress. Effective stakeholder management is essential to drive collective action towards sustainability goals.
Efficio recommendation
As the interface with the supply chain, Procurement should be a key player in the push to reduce Scope 3 emissions. Make sure your procurement team is equipped with the right digital tools, well-defined processes, and appropriate skillsets to monitor and measure suppliers’ sustainability performance. Embed sustainability as an imperative metric in your day-to-day operations to drive long-term value creation and resilience. Focus on delivering measurable impact: prioritize initiatives with the biggest potential for impact and deliver targeted action. Promote circularity from life span reviews, take-back schemes, recyclable materials, and low-emission distributions.
Insights
Scope 3 emissions: The key to tackling your organization’s sustainability targets
For more detailed insights, check out our viewpoint on how organizations can leverage Procurement for Scope 3 emissions reduction to make progress against their corporate sustainability goals.
How we can help
Supply Chain Management
If you are looking for a partner with experience in increasing supply chain resilience and performance, feel free to reach out via our Supply Chain management service page.
Talk to our team
Contact our procurement and supply chain specialists to find out how we can help you overcome your main challenges.
Related articles
-
Achieving sustainability targets via supply chains: The critical role of supplier engagement
Insight
Discover how a Sustainability Supplier Engagement program can help organizations across industries reduce carbon emissions and …
-
Megatrends: Procurement of the Future
Reports
In this piece, we focus on four key megatrends that businesses and their procurement teams should be focusing on in the upcomin…
-
Turning procurement into profit in the cannabis industry
Case Study
Find out how a cannabis producer boosted its profits via cost reduction and approached forecasting and planning in a fast-growi…